Jogo Hoje just went back to the tape on a messy UFC 327 moment: the UFC announced Chris Padilla as the winner on a majority decision, then did the right thing for the record and corrected the result after a review. Fast. Public. And honestly, that kind of anúncio ao vivo slip is exactly the thing that makes fans side-eye the credibility of official UFC communication.
The confusion in the official announcement
During the live coverage, the fight was declared a win for Padilla by decisão dos juízes with two judges scoring 29-27 and one judge at 28-28. But then the UFC went back, revised the call, and put out the correction: a empate majoritário, meaning the outcome is neither a win nor a loss, but an official draw under the majority framework. The UFC isn’t hiding behind silence here. It’s owning the mistake—and switching the narrative in real time.
What happened in the Padilla vs. Mederos fight
The matchup between UFC 327 prospects Chris Padilla and Marquel Mederos played out like a pressure test. It went the full distance of 3 rounds, with both men trading heavy shots and pushing forward at key moments. Padilla walked Mederos down, landed solid head strikes, and even in the clinch he found short, damaging work with tight positioning against the fence.
Mederos answered in kind. Late in the first round, he opened a deep cut above Padilla’s right eye, and that’s the kind of visual that immediately changes a fight’s rhythm. In the second, Padilla kept pressing with leg kicks and quick combinations—punches and straight shots meant to keep Mederos from resetting comfortably.
And still, the ending needed accounting. Because this is MMA, and the rulebook always comes due.
How the score changed the result
Here’s where the pontuação oficial matters most. After the review, the UFC ruled the official scoring as 29-27 for one judge and two more rounds scored as 28-28—with the corrected outcome landing as a empate majoritário.
- Initially announced: two judges at 29-27 for Padilla, one judge at 28-28
- Corrected version: one judge at 29-27, and two judges at 28-28
So yes, the live call flipped. And no, that’s not just trivia—this is the difference between walking out the winner’s lane or being forced into the draw column.
The illegal eye strike and the point loss
The turning piece wasn’t just who landed more cleanly. It was the penalty. Padilla was penalized with a perda de ponto for golpes ilegais toward the eyes. That deduction is not “shade” in the scoring—it’s an actual subtraction that can swing the math in close rounds.
Once the UFC performed the revisão do resultado, the official tally reflected the penalty, and the judges’ read changed accordingly. That’s how you get from the initial majority decision to the corrected decisão dos juízes that now reads as a majority draw.
The UFC correction and the impact on credibility
Look, officiating reviews happen. But the problem here is the timeline: the UFC made the call, it hit the live broadcast, and only afterward did the correction land. According to the UFC’s own update on April 11, 2026, the fight was ruled a majority draw after the correction. Still, the damage is real: when fans hear one thing on an anúncio ao vivo, then get a different official outcome later, trust takes a hit.
And that’s why this is urgent breaking news. Not because the bout lacked drama, but because the communication shouldn’t wobble. In a sport where every second counts, why should the scoring story be any less precise?
O Veredito Jogo Hoje
This is the kind of situation where the UFC fixed the record, sure—but the initial misfire still underlines a bigger issue: if the official broadcast can’t lock the pontuação oficial correctly in the moment, you’re not just correcting numbers, you’re re-shaping fan perception of the whole event. Padilla and Mederos fought for three rounds, the judges did their job, and the penalty for golpes ilegais was always going to matter. The only question is why the crowd had to hear the wrong story first. We’ll take the correction. But we won’t pretend it didn’t rattle the credibility of the UFC’s own live process.
— Breaking News Urgente, JogoHoje.esp.br
Perguntas Frequentes
Why did the UFC change the result of the fight?
The UFC corrected the outcome after a review, adjusting the pontuação oficial to reflect a point deduction tied to golpes ilegais toward the eyes. With the corrected scoring, the fight became a empate majoritário.
What was the official score between Chris Padilla and Marquel Mederos?
In the corrected decisão dos juízes, the official result was a majority draw: 29-27 on one card and two cards of 28-28.
Did the illegal eye strike directly influence the majority draw?
Yes. The perda de ponto for golpes ilegais was part of the reason the scoring shifted during the revisão do resultado, leading to the corrected empate majoritário rather than the initially announced majority decision.
